Legal Opinion

Caracul Fur Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 4, 1929No. 3234Published

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

The importation at bar consists of Exhibit 1, lambskin crosses, and Exhibit 2, lamb-leg crosses. They were assessed with duty at 40 per centum ad valorem as manufactures of fur, further advanced than dressing or dyeing, and sewed into crosses, under paragraph 1420 of the .Tariff Act of 1922, the pertinent portion of which reads:

Par. 1420. * * * manufactures of furs, excepting silver or black fox, further advanced than dressing and dyeing, prepared for use as material, joined or sewed together, including plates, linings, and crosses, except plates and mats of dog and goat skins, and articles…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. RichterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. Carlowitz v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. United States v. Hatters' Fur ExchangeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Rossman v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. Pacific Iron & Metal Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API