State v. Beard
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is the third appeal involving Burle Beard’s claims against the State of Alaska and several State employees. See Beard v. Baum, 796 P.2d 1344 (Alaska 1990) (Beard I); Cameron v. Beard, 864 P.2d 538 (Alaska 1993) (Beard II). In Beard II, we remanded for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether Beard’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies barred his claims. The superior court excused Beard’s failure to exhaust. The State and the individual defendants now appeal this ruling (and others). Beard’s consolidated cross-appeal argues that the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eidelson v. ArcherAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Cameron v. BeardAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Casey v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State, Department of Revenue v. AndradeAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- City of Fairbanks v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Noey v. BledsoeAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Rockney v. Boslough Construction Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Bruns v. Municipality of Anchorage, Anchorage Water & Wastewater UtilityAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.