Legal Opinion
Bruns v. Municipality of Anchorage, Anchorage Water & Wastewater Utility
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided June 1, 2001No. S-9394PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
John Bruns and Dennis Saathoff. former general foremen for the Municipality of Anchorage's Anchorage Water and Wastewater Utility, filed suit in Anchorage Superior Court in 1996 claiming back overtime pay. Bruns and Saathoff alleged that the Municipality owed them overtime pay under federal, state, and municipal law. The superior court granted the Municipality's motion for summary judgment and dismissed the plaintiffs' claims on the basis that the plaintiffs failed to exhaust their administrative remedies. Bruns and Saathoff have appealed this…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Sarah Robyns v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company and Community Centers of Indianapolis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Eidelson v. ArcherAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hymes v. DeRamusAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Varilek v. City of HoustonAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- RBG Bush Planes, LLC v. KirkAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Winterrowd v. State, Department of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Barnica v. Kenai Peninsula Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.