Legal Opinion
Ravel v. Hubbard
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 17, 1952No. Civ. 18879PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
Prom a judgment in favor of plaintiff after trial before the court in an action to recover damages for breach of a contract to permit plaintiff to do all defendant’s hauling of its prefabricated houses, defendants appeal.
Fads: On March 14, 1946, defendants wrote plaintiff as follows:
“Ravel Trux Co.
1528% North Cordon Street
Hollywood, California
‘1 Gentlemen:
“We are very anxious to have a mutual agreement in regards to the trucking of our prefabricated houses. It is my understanding that you have given our Mr. Galbraith the terms which have been accepted by him, and I understand that you will…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Vaughn v. JonasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Claiborne-Reno Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Long Beach Drug Co. v. United Drug Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Goldwater v. OltmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- J. C. Millett Co. v. Park & Tilford Distillers Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1954
- Waller v. TJD, INC.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Mangini v. Wolfschmidt, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1958
- Corp. of Presiding Bishop of Church of Jesus Christ of Latterday Saints v. CavanaughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Zimco Restaurants, Inc. v. Bartenders Union, Local 340California Court of Appeal · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.