Legal Opinion
United States v. Donald B. Phillips
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 31, 1994No. 93-16522PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Per curiam
Donald B. Phillips appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the United States in the government’s action to recover on several defaulted student loans. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416, 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937, 110 S.Ct. 3217, 110 L.Ed.2d 664 (1990), and we affirm.
Phillips contends the government’s action is barred by the statute of limitations. The United States contends that the action is not time-barred because the Higher Education Technical…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Stella MenatosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Patsy Ann HodgesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Henry P. GlocksonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. DavisDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1992
- United States v. WallDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1994
- Mountain Peaks Financial Services, Inc. v. Roth-SteffenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Kay F. Millard v. United Student Aid Funds, Inc., an Indiana Corporation and Superior Credit Service, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Lee v. PaigeDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.