Kay F. Millard v. United Student Aid Funds, Inc., an Indiana Corporation and Superior Credit Service, Inc., an Indiana Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether 20 U.S.C. § 1091a(a)(2)(B), which retroactively abrogates time-bars on the collection of student loans, applies to Kay Millard’s loans. We hold that the statute does apply to the loans at issue.
The court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.
I
In 1967, Kay Millard obtained two student loans, each for $1,000, 1 from the First National Bank. United Student Ad Funds (“USA Funds”), a private agency, provided and processed the application, prepared notes for Millard’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jeanette Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, a Federally-Chartered Credit Union Robert W. FleischmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Victor E. Braun v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Donald B. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Henry P. GlocksonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Gary Varjabedian v. Emulex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States Small Business Administration v. BensalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Cruz v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005