Legal Opinion

United States v. Smith

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided September 2, 1994No. Civ. 93-00943 DAEPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COLLECT SURCHARGE

DAVID ALAN EZRA, District Judge.

The court heard the cross motions on August 29, 1994. Defendant appeared on his own behalf; Michael Chun, Esq., appeared on behalf of plaintiff. After reviewing the motions and the supporting and opposing memoranda, the court GRANTS the plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment and DENIES the defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. However, the court DENIES the plaintiffs motion to collect a ten percent…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Rubin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. James B. Sackett and Gwendolyn SackettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  2. Thompson v. New Mexico Student Loan Guarantee Corp. (In Re Thompson)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
  3. United States v. GeorgeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
  4. United States v. McLaughlinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
  5. United States v. SingerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API