Legal Opinion

United States v. Davis

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided June 29, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-T-868-NPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MYRON H. THOMPSON, Chief Judge.

In this lawsuit, plaintiff United States of America seeks to recover a defaulted student loan from defendant Charlotte J. McClendon Davis. Both sides have moved for partial summary judgment on the issue of whether the government’s claim is time-barred. 1 For the reasons that follow, the court concludes that, as a result of amendments to the Higher Education Act of 1965, 2 this lawsuit is not time-barred.

I

The facts of this case are undisputed. In December 1972, Davis executed a promissory note to secure a student loan from the Beverly Hills National Bank in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Rubin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. Stella MenatosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. David Grider and Leon Gladecki v. Lauro Cavazos, Secretary of the United States Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Donald B. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Henry P. GlocksonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1994
  4. United States v. MastrovitoDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1993
  5. United States v. DavisDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API