Legal Opinion

Walmsley v. Holcomb

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 1943No. Civ. 3225PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

This is an action wherein plaintiff and respondent, as one of the owners of certain land described in the complaint, and as the assignee of George B. Kellar and Emma L. Kellar, seeks to recover certain money as rent for the described premises.

On February 1, 1935, George E. and Emma L. Kellar, lessors, entered into a five-year written lease, of approximately 70 acres of land in Riverside County, with one J. H. Hinkle, as lessee, “yielding and paying therefor the rent of one-fourth of all crops grown” thereon and “to pay the rent above stated for such further time as the lessee may hold the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. HauserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Harrelson v. Miller & Lux Inc.California Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Goldman v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Clarke v. CobbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Veysey v. MoriyamaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Greco v. Oregon Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Recorded Picture Co. [Prods.] Ltd. v. Nelson Entm't, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Pecarovich v. BeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Hearn Pacific Corp. v. Second Generation Roofing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Fanning v. Yoland Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API