Goldman v. Murray
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Garber, Creswell & Garber, and Hillyer, Stringham & O’Brien, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This is an action to enforce a stockholder’s liability for his proportion of certain debts of the corporation. The complaint charged in separate causes of action upon different items of indebtedness. One will serve as a type of all. After the allegations of the corporate existence and capacity of the corporation, the number of outstanding shares and the number of those shares owned by defendant Murray, it is alleged that the corporation became indebted to Alfred D. Bowen “for cash loaned and advanced for its use and benefit in the sum of $20,000”; that the corporation then made its promissory…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pierce v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- McIntyre v. HauserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Redington v. CornwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Knowles v. SandercockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Greco v. Oregon Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Guggenhime & Co. v. LamantiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- McCown v. SpencerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- First National Bank v. Pomona Tile Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
- Dunlap v. Commercial National Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.