Legal Opinion
Pecarovich v. Becker
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 29, 1952No. Civ. 15068PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Fred B.), J.
Defendant Virgil D. Dardi has appealed from a judgment for $10,500 in favor of plaintiff Michael Pecarovich, in an action for salary for the years 1944, 1945, and 1946, pursuant to a contract between Becker and Pecarovich whereby Becker, as owner of the San Francisco Clippers, a professional football team, employed Pecarovich as coach.
The principal questions upon this appeal are these: (1) Does the evidence support the finding that appellant assumed the obligations toward respondent which were created by the Becker-Pecarovich employment contract, and (2) If he did, does the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hollywood Motion Picture Equipment Co. v. FurerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Ellingson v. Walsh, O'Connor & BarnesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Jegen v. BergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Watson v. . RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Bergin v. Van Der SteenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- White Lighting Co. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Stearns v. Los Angeles City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Martin v. U-Haul Co. of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- People v. DrakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Recorded Picture Co. [Prods.] Ltd. v. Nelson Entm't, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.