Legal Opinion

City of Ada v. Criswell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 10, 1939No. 28715PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDanner, J.

The plaintiff in error, defendant in the trial court, appeals from a judgment for $750 based on a jury verdict in favor of tbe plaintiff in her action to recover damages for injuries received by reason of alleged negligence of the defendant to maintain a sidewalk in a reasonably safe condition for use by pedestrians.

Briefly, the facts harmonizing with the allegations in the petition are as follows: The defendant maintained a concrete sidewalk about five feet in width along Fourteenth street in the city of Ada. At a certain point in tbe sidewalk where a drain or gutter existed wooden planks…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. White v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. The Town of Norman v. TeelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  4. City of Woodward v. BowderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Sloan v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grand River Dam Authority v. BomfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. Town of Okemah v. LindseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. City of Duncan v. WoodsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. The Town of Antlers, Oklahoma, a Municipal Corporation v. Harold BensonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  5. Byford v. Town of AsherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API