Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kent v. Bell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1962No. Docket 29, Calendar 49,625PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1DissentCarr, C. J.

(dissenting). 'Plaintiff in this case brought suit in the circuit court of Oakland county-seeking the’specific enforcement of an alleged verbal contract claimed to have been made by him with Aileen Kent, his former wife. The bill of complaint alleged that for many years prior to November 24, 1950, plaintiff and Mrs. Kent were husband and wife, that during their ■ marriage they became the owners of a home in the city of Pontiac, and that, in divorce proceedings, pursuant to a property settlement agreement plaintiff released and surrendered his interest in said property to Mrs. Kent.

Plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Andrews v. AikensIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Applebaum v. WechslerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Plassey v. S. Loewenstein & SonMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Lyle v. MunsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Daugherty v. PoppenMichigan Supreme Court · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc. v. QuimbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  2. R. R. Improvement Ass'n v. ThomasMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Kent v. BellMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Ryan v. AlexyMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Berkaw v. Mayflower Congregational ChurchMichigan Supreme Court · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API