Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kent v. Bell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1965No. Calendar 24, Docket 50,470PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1DissentKelly, J.

For the second time this Court is asked to review the. trial court’s dismissal of plaintiff’s bill of complaint. Plaintiff’s original bill of complaint and our reasons why it failed to state a cause of action are fully set forth in Kent v. Bell, 368 Mich 443.

After remand, with fight to amend, plaintiff filed his amended complaint and, in his present brief, outlines the facts set forth in the amended complaint as follows :

“Plaintiff bought a lot before marriage, then caused to be drafted a plan of construction for a home on the lot; this home was constructed under the supervision of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cramer v. BallardMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Bayer v. Jackson City Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Willard v. ShekellMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Guzorek v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Lyle v. MunsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pittman v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  2. In Re EGBERT R SMITH TRUSTMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Jaye v. TobinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Lorimer Ex Rel. Estate of Lorimer v. BerrelezDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
  5. Miller Glass Co., Inc. v. KushmaulMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API