R. R. Improvement Ass'n v. Thomas

On too many occasions in recent years this Court has found it necessary to remand equity cases for á reason known specially to equity’s jurisdiction. See Sternberg v. Baxter, 373 Mich 8, 18; Falkner v. Brookfield, 368 Mich 17, 25; Kent v. Bell, 368 Mich 443, 451; Kenney v. Village of Novi, 367 Mich 75, 76, 77, and Crocker v. Crocker, 362 Mich 6, 8, all of which quote or cite Culy v. Upham, 135 Mich 131 (106 Am St Eep 388). In Culy v. Upham this regularly quoted passage appears (p 135):

“"We do not wish, by our silence, to seem to approve the procedure adopted in this case. If we had disagreed…