Legal Opinion

Plassey v. S. Loewenstein & Son

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1951No. Docket 47, Calendar 45,069PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

In a general way the instant case arose out of the sáme facts and circumstances as City of Detroit v. S. Loewenstein & Son, ante, 359; and to the extent the pertinent facts are set forth in the cited case there -is no need for rejDetition. Some, but not all, of the issues presented by this appeal'were passed upon in the cited case. • In this suit plaintiff Plassey is the owner of 3 apartment buildings which provide living facilities for approximately 92 families. One. of the apartments is occupied by plaintiff Taylor. These 2 allege they have brought this suit in behalf of themselves.and of a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Warren Township School District No. 7 v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Morse v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Briggs v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Lansing v. PerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Barth v. Christian Psychopathic Hospital Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Adkins v. Thomas Solvent Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Township of Garfield v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Valentine v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Moore v. Bridgewater Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  5. Kent County Aeronautics Board v. Department of State PoliceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API