Legal Opinion

Harkavy v. Phoenix Insurance Company

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1967PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Buenett

The appellant, Esther Harkavy, filed a suit in the Chancery Court against the appellee, Phoenix Insurancé Company.' The purpose of her suit was to recover the amount of automobile medical insurance provided in the Phoenix policy which she carried on herself.

On March 11,1965, Esther Harkavy was involved in an automobile accident when she was riding as a passenger with one Markowitz. As a result of Markowitz’s car being hit by a car driven by a third party, she was severely injured and as a result of these' injuries spent some $2,500.00 for medical expenses and treatment.

At the time of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kopp v. Home Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Air Transport Manufacturing Co. v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Tart v. RegisterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Anderson v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Garcia v. LovelletteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. Ryan v. MFA Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  4. Paul v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
  5. Southern Trust Insurance Company v. Matthew PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API