Ryan v. MFA Mutual Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DROWOTA, Judge.
The sole issue in this appeal from the granting of a motion to dismiss is whether an innocent co-insured can collect on a joint insurance policy where the other co-insured destroyed the insured property, and where the innocent co-insured’s interest in the property is severable from that of the other co-insured. In this case, appellant James Ryan’s wife set fire to their house, and Ryan sought a recovery from appellee MFA Mutual Insurance Company for the value of certain destroyed contents of the house which he claimed belonged to him. A copy of Ryan’s policy with the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Steigler v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
- Monaghan v. Agricultural Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Howell v. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Hoyt v. New Hampshire Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942
- Economy Fire & Casualty Co. v. WarrenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Hedtcke v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Richards v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Krupp v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Spence v. Allstate Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1994
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.