Legal Opinion

Ryan v. MFA Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided April 25, 1980PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Judge.

The sole issue in this appeal from the granting of a motion to dismiss is whether an innocent co-insured can collect on a joint insurance policy where the other co-insured destroyed the insured property, and where the innocent co-insured’s interest in the property is severable from that of the other co-insured. In this case, appellant James Ryan’s wife set fire to their house, and Ryan sought a recovery from appellee MFA Mutual Insurance Company for the value of certain destroyed contents of the house which he claimed belonged to him. A copy of Ryan’s policy with the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Steigler v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
  2. Monaghan v. Agricultural Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Howell v. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  4. Hoyt v. New Hampshire Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942
  5. Economy Fire & Casualty Co. v. WarrenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Hedtcke v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Richards v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  3. Krupp v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. Spence v. Allstate Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1994

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API