Legal Opinion

Coss v. Steward

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 11, 2011No. AC 32014PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAVINE, J.

The plaintiffs, Edward Coss and Kathleen Coss, appeal following the rendering of summary judgment in favor of the defendants. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment by (1) concluding that the defendants were not equitably estopped from asserting the statute of limitations as a special defense, (2) considering the plaintiffs’ right to seek redress from the third party defendant, (3) weighing the facts before the plaintiffs had an opportunity to conduct discovery, (4) considering whether their stone…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Standard Tallow Corp. v. JowdySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Doty v. MucciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Novella v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  4. Sturm v. Harb Development, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  5. Morris v. CostaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. BertrandConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. Masse v. PerezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  3. INTERNATIONAL STRATEGIES GROUP, LTD. v. NessCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  4. Robbins v. Physicians for Women's Health, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  5. Romprey v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API