People v. Rhodes
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WRIGHT, C. J.
Defendant Douglas Lamar Rhodes, an indigent, was convicted of forgery (Pen. Code, § 470) after a jury trial at which he was represented by appointed counsel who, at the time of the appointment and trial was the City Attorney of Hanford.1 Hanford is the county seat of Kings County wherein the trial was conducted. The responsibilities of a city attorney include, inter alia, the prosecution of persons accused of violating city ordinances. (Gov. Code, § 41803; People ex rel. Chapman v. Rapsey (1940) 16 Cal.2d 636, 643 [107 P.2d 388].)2 Defendant’s principal contention on…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- State v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. GainerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Stone v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. Superior Court (Greer)California Supreme Court · 1977
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.