Legal Opinion

People v. Rhodes

California Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1974No. Crim. 17498PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WRIGHT, C. J.

Defendant Douglas Lamar Rhodes, an indigent, was convicted of forgery (Pen. Code, § 470) after a jury trial at which he was represented by appointed counsel who, at the time of the appointment and trial was the City Attorney of Hanford.1 Hanford is the county seat of Kings County wherein the trial was conducted. The responsibilities of a city attorney include, inter alia, the prosecution of persons accused of violating city ordinances. (Gov. Code, § 41803; People ex rel. Chapman v. Rapsey (1940) 16 Cal.2d 636, 643 [107 P.2d 388].)2 Defendant’s principal contention on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. GainerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Stone v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. Superior Court (Greer)California Supreme Court · 1977

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API