Dressel v. Ameribank
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
With this case we determine whether a lender that charges a fee for the completion of standard mortgage documents engages in the unauthorized practice of law under MCL 450.681. The Court of Appeals held that the lender is so engaged and reversed a circuit court order granting summary disposition in favor of defendant. We conclude that such conduct does not constitute the practice of law and, accordingly, reverse the Court of Appeals judgment and reinstate the circuit court order in favor of defendant.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In 1997, plaintiffs obtained from defendant Ameribank a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Roberts v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Smith v. Globe Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. Borchard-RuhlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Hoste v. Shanty Creek Management, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by145 opinions
- Johnson v. ReccaMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- Morris Pumps v. Centerline Piping, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Burton v. Reed City Hospital Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Meyer & Anna Prentis Family Foundation, Inc. v. Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Hill v. Sears, Roebuck and CoMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.