Legal Opinion

Morales v. Auto-Owners Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1998No. 107351, Calendar No. 13PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, J.

At issue in this case is whether defendant properly denied coverage to the plaintiff under the terms of his no-fault insurance policy. Plaintiff was left substantially disabled when he was involved *290in an automobile accident on December 3, 1991. Although plaintiff had purchased no-fault coverage from defendant, it refused to cover any of the medical expenses associated with the accident, claiming that the plaintiff’s policy expired six days before the accident occurred. Both the trial court and the Court of Appeals agreed with the defendant that the no-fault policy had automatically expired at…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Radtke v. EverettMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ruddock v. Detroit Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Groncki v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Fleckenstein v. Citizens' Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Pastucha v. RothMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. City of Grosse Pointe Park v. Michigan Municipal Liability & Property PoolMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Laier v. KitchenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Herman v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Morales v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Morris & Doherty, PC v. LockwoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API