Legal Opinion

Helder v. Sruba

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 2000No. Docket 114885PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff obtained a default judgment against the defendants, and then began garnishment proceedings to obtain the proceeds of an insurance policy that had been purchased by one of the defendants. The insurer defended by asserting that the insured had breached the insurance contract by failing to provide notice of the suit. On a statutory ground, the circuit court ordered the insurer to pay the plaintiff. The Court of Appeals reversed, but we reinstate the judgment of the circuit court.

i

From late 1991 through early 1994, plaintiff Linda M. Helder had a relationship with defendant Edward…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Turner v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Browder v. International Fidelity InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Salas v. ClementsMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Shallal v. Catholic Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Dressel v. AmeribankMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Lash v. City of Traverse CityMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Burton v. Reed City Hospital Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In Re Request for Advisory Opinion Regarding Constitutionality of 2005 Pa 71Michigan Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Morales v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API