Legal Opinion

United States v. Frank Allen Yeo

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 24, 1984No. 83-2390PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAGG, Circuit Judge.

Frank Yeo appeals from his conviction for using extortionate means to collect a debt, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 894(a)(1) and (2). On appeal Yeo alleges, among other things, that an instruction to the jury constructively amended the indictment. Because we agi*ee with this contention, we reverse.

Yeo was charged in three counts of a four-count indictment. Count one, the only count on which Yeo was convicted, charged that on or about May 5, 1982, Yeo and Roy McMahan difl aid, abet, cause, and participate in the use of an extortionate means to collect and attempt to collect…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United States v. Leroy HayesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. Tyrone Smith, United States of America v. Anthony E. GartrellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. John M. BeelerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. Jerry R. Mastelotto, and Willis B. InglesbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. United States v. Jose P. FlorescaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  2. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. United States v. Alfred Lee ApodacaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. Julio PiccinonnaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API