Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1988No. 53997-9PublishedCited by 153 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brachtenbach, J. —

The primary issues are whether the trial court properly admitted prior misdemeanor theft convictions pursuant to ER 404(b), and whether the trial court properly ruled that the same convictions and a prior felony theft conviction were admissible for impeachment purposes pursuant to ER 609.

Our decision in this case changes this state's law relating to ER 609(a) in a number of respects; each change has been weighed carefully. We are mindful of principles of stare decisis, and we have not lightly altered prior decisional law. Yet this case has, by its factual status and the…

2Cases cited83 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by153 opinions

  1. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. GentryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. FinchWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996

148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API