Legal Opinion

United States v. Julio Piccinonna

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 28, 1989No. 86-5335PublishedCited by 118 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAY, Circuit Judge:

In this case, we revisit the issue of the admissibility at trial of polygraph expert testimony and examination evidence. Julio Piccinonna appeals his conviction on two counts of knowingly making false material statements to a Grand Jury in violation of Title IV of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970. 18 U.S.C. 1623 (1982). Picci-nonna argues that the trial judge erred in refusing to admit the testimony of his polygraph expert and the examination results. Because of the significant progress made in the field of polygraph testing over the past forty years and its…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Hawkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. People v. BaynesIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by118 opinions

  1. Conner v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. United States v. Wyatt HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  4. People v. WilkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. United States v. Miriam Henao Posado, Pablo Ramirez and Irma Clemencia HurtadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API