Legal Opinion

United States v. Jerry R. Mastelotto, and Willis B. Inglesby

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 19, 1983No. 81-1678, 81-1679PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Mastelotto and Inglesby appeal their convictions on two counts of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (1976) and eight counts of wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (1976). Each timely appealed. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1976).

Defendants contend that the indictment under which they were tried is duplicitous since each of its counts alleges the defendants’ participation in two independent fraudulent schemes. They further assert that, even if the indictment itself is not duplicitous, the trial court’s failure to give a “same single…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. FregaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Alvin Frazin, United States of America v. Ronald Mark MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Joe S. Duncan and Michael M. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. Frederick Ines Gordon, United States of America v. Edward LoeswickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API