State v. Ling

David Ling appeals from the judgment and sentence entered following his conviction for second degree burglary. Ling maintains that his CrR 3.3 speedy trial rights were violated when he was tried on the 104th day following the filing of the information. We disagree and affirm.

The relevant dates may be summarized as follows:

February 10, 1988

Information filed charging Ling with second degree burglary;

April 11, 1988

Ling arrested and makes court appearance; released on personal recognizance, subject to conditions of release;

April 18, 1988

Counsel for Ling files written objection to arraignment date;