State v. Striker
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.
The court is asked to declare the speedy trial requirements where there is a period of delay between the filing of an information and the preliminary appearance (or the date the defendant is held to answer).
In November 1975, the petitioners, being made aware that certain of their business transactions were under investigation, went to the prosecutor’s office and submitted to fingerprinting. They were accompanied by their counsel, to whom they surrendered their passports, and whom they agreed to keep advised of their whereabouts. No arrests were made.
On January 19, 1976, the prosecutor filed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Rost v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- State v. ParmeleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by170 opinions
- State v. GreenwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. FladeboWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. PachecoWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. PriceWashington Supreme Court · 1980
165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.