State v. Carpenter
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.
The issue here is whether defendant was denied a speedy trial pursuant to CrR 3.3. More specifically, it is the applicable date from which to calculate the period during which defendant must be brought to trial. Defendant contends the interpretation of CrR 3.3 announced in State v. Striker, 87 Wn.2d 870, 557 P.2d 847 (1976), should apply and that the applicable date is the filing of the information. We agree and reverse.
The sequence of events is crucial to our determination. The chronological account of the facts is as follows:
April 1978. Sergeant Meier of the Olympia Police Department took…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. StrikerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. CummingsWashington Supreme Court · 1976
3Cited by48 opinions
- State v. GreenwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. PachecoWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. HudsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- State v. StewartWashington Supreme Court · 1996
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.