Legal Opinion

State v. Baxter

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 6, 1986No. 7300-5-IIPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPetrich, J.

—The State appeals from the dismissal with prejudice of charges against Henry Baxter based on the trial court's interpretation of the time period within which the accused must be brought to trial under CrR 3.3. The issues we are asked to decide are (1) the determination of the date from which to calculate the period during which defendant must be brought to trial, when there has been a substantial delay between the filing of an information and the defendant's arraignment, and (2) the determination of any excluded time once the speedy trial period has started. We affirm the dismissal.

On August…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. StrikerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. McIntyreWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. RoadhsWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. HutchinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. PawlykWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. PizzutoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  4. State v. MiffittCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  5. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API