Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Franchise Tax Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 8, 1986No. A025845PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SMITH, J.

Daniel L. Mitchell and Wendy Mitchell appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered after the sustaining of the demurrer of defendant, State of California Franchise Tax Board (FTB), to their second amended complaint without leave to amend. We affirm.

On November 23, 1982, plaintiffs filed a complaint for damages against the State of California and various individual defendants (apparently employees of the FTB), attempting to state causes of action for negligence, slander of title and interference with credit relations arising out of a California personal income tax proposed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Newton v. PoindexterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1984
  4. Nadon v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. HyattSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Craland, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Rickley v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Guevara v. Ventura County Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API