Legal Opinion
Newton v. Poindexter
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 18, 1984No. Nos. Civ.S-83-980, 1041, 1054, 1076, 1110, 1126, 1179, 1180, 1213 RARPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*279MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RAMIREZ, District Judge.
The motion of the defendant to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction came on specially for hearing on December 16, 1983.1 Derry L. Knight and Robert D. Milam, Deputies Attorney General, appeared on behalf of the defendant and moving party. Plaintiffs, and each of them, having had appropriate notice of the defendant’s motion, failed to appear or otherwise file a timely opposition to the motion to dismiss. Having read and considered the memoranda submitted by counsel, the attachments thereto, the pleadings, and the arguments of counsel, the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNarySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mitchell v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Moore v. KamikawaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1995
- (HC) Neely v. CovelloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- (HC) Roberson v. Sacramento County Superior CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Dunsmore v. The Supreme Court of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.