Legal Opinion

Nadon v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 11, 1980No. Civ. 55730PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KINGSLEY, Acting P. J.

Defendants City of Los Angeles and its treasurer appeal from a judgment awarding damages for loss of property in a sale foreclosing an improvement bond. We reverse the judgment.

In 1967 plaintiffs became the owners of a tract of land located in the City of Los Angeles and duly recorded their deeds on December 4, 1967. They paid one installment of taxes for the year 1967-1968, but otherwise did not pay property taxes. In 1970, pursuant to a demand from the holder of a bond issued for an assessment made on the property under the Improvement Act of 1911, the treasurer…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. Alma Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Craland, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Newton v. PoindexterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1984
  3. Mitchell v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API