Legal Opinion
Craland, Inc. v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 23, 1989No. B037426PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ORTEGA, J.
Plaintiff Craland, Inc., appeals from the judgment of dismissal following the sustaining of a demurrer without leave to amend against its second amended complaint for fraudulent breach of contract and breach of implied warranty. We conclude plaintiff’s remedies as a purchaser at a public sale of tax-defaulted real property against defendants State of California (State) and County of Los Angeles (County) are limited to those provided by statute. Affirmed.
Background
At a January 1981 tax sale, plaintiff successfully bid on approximately 36 acres of tax-defaulted real property…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lingsch v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Routh v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Southern Service Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Holland v. HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Herzog v. Capital Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
- Karoutas v. HomeFed BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Jackson v. Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- McCulloch v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Van Petten v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.