Legal Opinion

Karash v. Kolatch

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLouis B. Heller, J.

In this slander and libel action defendant moves for an order pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice, striking out paragraphs of the complaint numbered “TWENTY-SIXTH”, “thirty-fourth”, “ FORTY-SECOND ”, “FIFTIETH ”, “ fifty-eighth ” and “ sixty-sixth ”, as being irrelevant, redundant, repetitious and unnecessary, and pursuant to rule 102 of the Rules of Civil Practice directing that the complaint be made more definite and certain by stating the date when and the place where the alleged slanders set forth in para-

*1085graphs of the complaint numbered “seventh”, “ eleventh ” “ FIFTEENTH…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Locke v. Benton & Bowles, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  2. Kolb v. MortimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  3. Potash v. SacksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  4. Ginsberg v. Farmers National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Kaplan v. K. Ginsburg, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rossignol v. SilvernailAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API