Legal Opinion

Raymond v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 28, 1977No. 7577PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.

The facts of this case are detailed in Raymond v. Eli Lilly & Co., 412 F. Supp. 1392 (D.N.H. 1976), and need not be repeated in full here. For the present purposes the relevant facts are as follows: On February 26, 1975, Patricia Raymond brought suit in Hillsborough County Superior Court alleging that C-Quens, an oral contraceptive manufactured and distributed by the defendant, caused hemorrhages in her optic nerves causing her to become legally blind. Arthur Raymond, the plaintiff’s husband, sued the defendant for consequential damages resulting from his wife’s blindness. The defendant…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. Williams v. Brown Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Hendrickson v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  4. Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  5. Berry v. G. D. Searle & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  2. O'Stricker v. Jim Walter Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Garrett v. Raytheon Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Harig v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Borello v. U.S. Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1986

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API