Legal Opinion
In Re Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 14, 2008No. M:07-cv-01819 CW. MDL No. 1819PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND DEFERRING RULING ON DEFENDANT MOSEL VITELIC’S MOTION TO DISMISS
CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge.
All Defendants have moved to dismiss both the Direct Purchasers’ consolidated amended complaint (DPC) and the Indirect Purchasers’ consolidated amended complaint (IPC). 1 As directed by the Court the Direct-Purchaser Defendants (DP Defendants) and IndirecL-Purehaser Defendants (IP Defendants) have each filed a motion that addresses all of the issues common to the respective group of Defendants. In addition, several…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
- In Re Packaged Ice Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- Sheet Metal Workers Local 441 Health & Welfare Plan v. Glaxosmithkline, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.