Legal Opinion

William Shaland Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 26, 1968No. C.D. 3308PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

These cases consolidated for trial concern the propriety of the collector’s action in classifying certain articles as “Toys, not specially provided for” under paragraph 1513 of the *182Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, dutiable at 35 percent ad valorem.1 Plaintiff claims that the articles should properly be classified as “Telescopes” under paragraph 228(b) of the act, as modified, dutiable at 25 percent ad valorem.2 All other claims have been abandoned by plaintiff.

Paragraph 1513 provides in part:

* * * As used in this paragraph the term “toy” means an article chiefly used for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  2. Atkinson, Haserick & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  3. S. Rosenberg Christmas Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  4. Shackman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ero Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
  2. Western Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. Spesco Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. Poynter Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  5. Knickerbocker Plastic Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API