Legal Opinion

Spesco Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 26, 1969No. C.D. 3749PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

This case involves the proper classification of five small candy-filled replicas of hand tools which were imported from Hong Kong via Savannah, Georgia, and were invoiced as “Plastic Tots * * * Candy filled (Screwdriver; Axe; Hammer; Chisel; Plier)They were classified by the customs collector as toys under item 737.90 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (19 U.S.C. § 1202), and assessed with duty at the rate of 35 percent ad valorem.

*298Plaintiff challenges this classification, claiming that the merchandise is properly classifiable under item 157.10 of the tariff schedules…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wilson's Customs Clearance, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Davis Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. United States v. Yamamoto & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  5. William Shaland Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Silver Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. Associated Hobby Mfrs., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  3. Fontana Hollywood Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  4. Davies, Turner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  5. Sports Specialties Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API