Spesco Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Maletz, Judge:
This case involves the proper classification of five small candy-filled replicas of hand tools which were imported from Hong Kong via Savannah, Georgia, and were invoiced as “Plastic Tots * * * Candy filled (Screwdriver; Axe; Hammer; Chisel; Plier)They were classified by the customs collector as toys under item 737.90 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (19 U.S.C. § 1202), and assessed with duty at the rate of 35 percent ad valorem.
*298Plaintiff challenges this classification, claiming that the merchandise is properly classifiable under item 157.10 of the tariff schedules…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wilson's Customs Clearance, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Davis Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- United States v. Yamamoto & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
- William Shaland Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- National Silver Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Associated Hobby Mfrs., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- Fontana Hollywood Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Davies, Turner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
- Sports Specialties Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970