Western Importing Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Maletz, Judge:
These consolidated cases involve the proper tariff classification of importations from Hong Kong which were described variously on the invoices as “Plastic toy miniature slot machine assorted colours” and “Plastic Miniature Slot Machines.” They were classified by the collector of customs under item 737.90 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (19 U.S.C. § 1202) as toys and assessed with duty at 35 percent ad valorem. Plaintiff’s claim is that the importations are properly classifiable under item 734.20 of the tariff schedules as game machines, dutiable at the rate of 11%…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wilson's Customs Clearance, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Davis Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- United States v. Hillier's Son Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Hoffschlaeger Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- William Shaland Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
- Mego Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- Styson Art Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Gimbel Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.