Legal Opinion

S. Rosenberg Christmas Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 16, 1963No. 68170; protests 61/13751 and 61/16687 (San Francisco)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

Two items are in dispute in these two protests. In protest 61/13751, the article in question is described on the invoice as “Mechanical Snowman with a broom and bell — Battery Operated.” The item involved in protest 61/16687 is described on the invoice therewith as “Battery Operated Santa Claus w/bell action.” Both articles were classified under the provision in paragraph 1513 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 54108, for toys, not specially provided for, consisting of figures or images of animate objects, wholly or in chief value of metal, having a movable…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Illfelder v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. William Shaland Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. Davies, Turner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  3. J.C. Penney Purchasing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API