Legal Opinion

Bauer v. State Board of Agriculture

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1911No. Calendar No. 24,265PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Mandamus by Anton C. Bauer ‘ against the State board of agriculture to compel respondents to abrogate a contract with the United States post office department and to restrain the construction of a building to be leased for use as a post office.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

Upon the petition of the relator an order to show cause was made by this court, directed to the respondent, the State board of agriculture, requiring it to show cause why the writ of mandamus should not issue to compel it to—

“Abrogate the contract heretofore made or attempted to be made with the United States government, whereby it, the said State board of agriculture, has agreed to furnish quarters for a United States post office at East Lansing, Mich. (5) That it cease from construction and expending moneys for construction of quarters for a United States post office at East Lansing, Mich,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sterling v. Regents of UniversityMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Regents of the University of Michigan v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Board of Regents of University of Michigan v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State v. Regents of the University SystemSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  4. Federated Publications, Inc v. Michigan State University Board of TrusteesMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Sprik v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICH.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API