Weinberg v. Regents of University
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Washtenaw. (Kinne, J.)- Case. Defendant corporation brings error. The facts are stated‘in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The plaintiff brought suit against the Eegents of the University of Michigan, James B. Angelí, James H. Wade, and Charles E. Whitman to recover the value of materials furnished to one Lucas, a subcontractor in the building of the University hospital. The right of action is claimed under Act No. 94, Laws of 1883, as amended by Act No. 45, Laws of 1885 (3 How. Stat. § 8411a). 'The declaration avers:
“That the Eegents of the University of Michigan is a public corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Michigan, created for the government of the University of Michigan, which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McDonald v. Massachusetts General HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Aplin v. Regents of the UniversityMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Owen v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Wells v. Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by49 opinions
- MacK v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Regents of the University v. Employment Relations CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Regents of the University of Michigan v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- State Ex Rel. University of Minnesota v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Board of Regents of University of Michigan v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.