Legal Opinion

Polo Ranch Co. v. City of Cheyenne

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 2003No. 01-92PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Justice.

[¶ 1] This is an appeal from the partial entry of summary judgment by the district court ruling 1) that appellants Polo Ranch Company, John N. Morris, and Norma B. Morris (collectively “PRC”), do not have any right to drill for subsurface water on the lands subject to a 1955 agreement (“Agreement”) entered into between John H. Bell (“Bell”),1 predecessor to PRC, and appellee City of Cheyenne Board of Public Utilities (“City”); 2) that PRC is barred by the doctrine of res judicata from relitigating the meaning of the term “exclusive” as used within the Agreement; and 3) that…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Wilder v. Cody Country Chamber of CommerceWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Allen v. AllenWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Amoco Production Co. v. EM Nominee Partnership Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Slavens v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Wolter v. Equitable Resources Energy Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1999

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cathcart v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Beaulieu v. FlorquistWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Kite Ranch, LLC v. Powell Family of Yakima, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Jacoby v. JacobyWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Goodman v. VossWyoming Supreme Court · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API