Legal Opinion

Northwest Prosthetic & Orthotic Clinic, Inc. v. Centennial Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 24, 2000No. 44254-6-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Becker, A.C.J.

— An insured’s breach of insurance policy provisions will not result in denial of coverage unless the breach caused actual prejudice. In this case, the insured settled a debatable defamation claim before the insurer had a meaningful opportunity to investigate it. We affirm a summary judgment order excusing the insurer from its obligation to provide coverage because the loss of the opportunity to investigate amounted to actual prejudice.

In reviewing a summary judgment order, this court evaluates the matter de novo, engaging in the same inquiry as the trial court. Kruse v. Hemp,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Kruse v. HempWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Oregon Automobile Insurance v. SalzbergWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Canron, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  5. Unigard Insurance v. LevenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. USF InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Prince George's County v. Local Government Insurance TrustCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Friedland v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  4. Allstate Insurance v. HustonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. Goodstein v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API