Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance v. Huston

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 13, 2004No. 29292-1-IIPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Morgan, A.C.J.

In this fire insurance case, a jury found that the insureds had not committed arson but had made material misrepresentations to the insurer. The insureds appeal, contending that their misrepresentations were immaterial and that bailiff or juror misconduct warrants a new trial. We affirm.

Edwin and Ruth Huston owned a house that Allstate insured against fire. Allstate’s policy excluded coverage for any loss due to a fire that the insured set intentionally.1 The policy also excluded coverage for “any loss or occurrence in which any insured person has concealed or misrepresented any…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Draper v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mayer v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Longobardi v. Chubb Ins. Co. of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  5. State v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court · 2003

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Colorado Structures, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of the WestWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Colorado Structures, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of the WestWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Ki Sin Kim v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. Karpenski v. American General Life Companies, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2014
  5. Colo. Structures, Inc. v. INSURANCE CO. OF WESTCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API