Legal Opinion

Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. USF Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 2008No. 80199-1PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.

¶1 Petitioner USF Insurance Company and respondents Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance Company (MOE) and Commercial Underwriters Insurance Company (CUIC) all insured Dally Homes, Inc., a homebuilder and developer, for a condominium development called Windsong Arbor. After the Windsong Arbor Homeowners’ Association (Homeowners) sued Dally for construction defects, Dally settled with MOE and CUIC. Dally intentionally did not tender a claim to USF. MOE and CUIC later brought an action for contribution and subrogation against USF. At issue is whether the “selective tender” rule applies to bar MOE and…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. National Surety Corp. v. Immunex Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Viking Bank v. Firgrove Commons 3, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Ingenco Holdings, LLC v. Ace American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Trinity Universal Insurance v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. McGuire v. BatesWashington Supreme Court · 2010

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API