Legal Opinion

Oregon Automobile Insurance v. Salzberg

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1975No. 43487PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

This is a declaratory judgment action instituted by respondent Oregon Automobile Insurance Company to secure relief from responsibility under an automobile insurance policy issued by it to its insured. Respondent’s insured is Harvey Salzberg who is a defendant in a tort action for damages brought by Ralph Simpson. The tort action has been stayed pending disposition of the instant declaratory judgment action. The trial court granted a summary judgment in favor of respondent, ruling that the insured had breached the cooperation clause, thereby relieving the insurer of any duty to defend…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Touchette v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Campbell v. Allstate Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, Mich. v. Winget Winget v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, MichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  4. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Van Dyke v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. PUD DISTRICT NO. 1, KLICKITAT COUNTY v. International Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Overton v. Consolidated Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Johnson Controls, Inc. v. BowesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. Alcazar v. HayesTennessee Supreme Court · 1998

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API