Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Medical Society v. Foster

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 1992No. 137 M.D. 1990PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALLADINO, Judge.

In our original jurisdiction under Pa.R.C.P. No. 1035, Petitioner Pennsylvania Medical Society (Society) has filed a motion for summary judgment based on its interpretations of the newly enacted physician billing and reimbursement provisions of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (Law), 75 Pa.C.S. §§ 1701-1799.7. For the following reasons, we deny summary judgment.

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On March 27, 1990, the Society filed a petition for review in the commonwealth court’s original jurisdiction. The petition concerned the implementation of section 18 of the Act of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Marks v. TasmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Gambone v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Adler v. Montefiore Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Nixon v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Coppolino v. NoonanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Johnson v. Allegheny Intermediate UnitCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Pittsburgh Neurosurgery Associates, Inc. v. DannerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Diwara v. State Board of CosmetologyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API