Pennsylvania Medical Society v. Foster
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
PALLADINO, Judge.
In our original jurisdiction under Pa.R.C.P. No. 1035, Petitioner Pennsylvania Medical Society (Society) has filed a motion for summary judgment based on its interpretations of the newly enacted physician billing and reimbursement provisions of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (Law), 75 Pa.C.S. §§ 1701-1799.7. For the following reasons, we deny summary judgment.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On March 27, 1990, the Society filed a petition for review in the commonwealth court’s original jurisdiction. The petition concerned the implementation of section 18 of the Act of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Marks v. TasmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Gambone v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Adler v. Montefiore Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Nixon v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Coppolino v. NoonanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Johnson v. Allegheny Intermediate UnitCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Pittsburgh Neurosurgery Associates, Inc. v. DannerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Diwara v. State Board of CosmetologyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.